Jump to content

So Who's The "minor Royal"?


threegee

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Putting a gagging order on topical news is a "red rag" to the Internet. :D

more tat to write about god can they not write about something decent? who cares what the "royals" get up to!

bunch of glorified muppets if you ask me! the reporters that is! :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What or who is a "minor royal"?

I knew a few royal miners...............

http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/avdb/news/uk/v...?ad=1&ct=50

A posting on Yahoo says:

Lord Frederick Windsor, son of the Windsor Family black sheep Prince and Princess Michael of Kent. He has admitted to cocaine abuse in the past, 1999, and is openly homosexual. He's a board member of the gay social club Sweet Suite, in Soho, London

So.. if they hadn't issued a gagging order, and the whole thing had been in the open - like mere mortal's cases - it would have gone unnoticed, or at least have blown over by now. Wonder how much the whole charade cost the taxpayer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/avdb/news/uk/v...?ad=1&ct=50

A posting on Yahoo says:

So.. if they hadn't issued a gagging order, and the whole thing had been in the open - like mere mortal's cases - it would have gone unnoticed, or at least have blown over by now. Wonder how much the whole charade cost the taxpayer?

I really dont know why you put up with this mob of so called royals. Bunch of lazy expensive yahoos.

Thank god we dont have to worry about them, or their numerous hangers on. We have enough of the run of the mill politicians to worry fret about.

Joe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol::lol: Wikipedia has just added a paragraph to cover it!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Frederick_Windsor

The amusing bit is the quote from 1999: "It is very difficult to avoid getting into this sort of thing when you move in these circles.." Now which circles could he possibly mean? Surely not the Royal Family?! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the Daily Mail is playing games too:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/arti...70&ito=1595

Read the article and it's a simple process of elimination. If you are in any doubt they've almost spelled out the location. K.E.N..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who cares who did what... of everything happening in this world, the biggest story of the week is Guess What A Random Royal Did.

WHO CARES!?

Ship them off is what I say, and send the crappy newspapers with them.

I care..if any of the Royals have been up to no good, i want them named and shamed :lol:

It`s like that time that Prince Charles had been caught in the act with a member of his male staff, (snigger) that was hushed up pretty quick!

The whole lot of them are dodgy i think..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol::lol: Wikipedia has just added a paragraph to cover it!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Frederick_Windsor

....

And now... someone has removed it! :D :D :D

Censorship on Wikipedia? Is there a new year's honour at stake here?

The plot thickens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Mail has now re-written their article to remove both the name, and the holier-than-thou stuff about the Internet. But they've added an open invitation to find out for yourself:

• The British media is forbidden by a court order from revealing the name or even the gender of the Royal Family member at the centre of the blackmail case.

But no such restrictions can control the world wide web.

Yesterday the name of the person was only a click of a mouse and a ten-second internet trawl away.

By posing a simple question on a number of search engines, it was astonishingly easy to identify the royal individual.

One forum gave the name and then added: "And (gender then mentioned) is being blackmailed."

Another site was even more direct, giving a colour photograph of the person with the accompanying words:

"Guess who this is and why (gender then mentioned) will soon be in the Press???"

Such chatrooms and discussion sites are both uneditable and impossible to police or control.

In addition, there is no chance of information - once it has been displayed on the internet - being comprehensively deleted.

Obviously a more experienced journalist at work here, and a better read. I believe the gender may already have been mentioned by the British press: yesterday - by the Daily Mail! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I care..if any of the Royals have been up to no good, i want them named and shamed :lol:

It`s like that time that Prince Charles had been caught in the act with a member of his male staff, (snigger) that was hushed up pretty quick!

The whole lot of them are dodgy i think..

Prince Charles is gay?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really dont know why you put up with this mob of so called royals. Bunch of lazy expensive yahoos.

Thank god we dont have to worry about them, or their numerous hangers on. We have enough of the run of the mill politicians to worry fret about.

Joe

As in the UK :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Monsta,

First immigrants, now women.

Is this what you believe to be a broadening of your horizons!

Try again kid!

Joe

whats wrong joe get out the wrong side of bed!

any i wasn't having a go at women just pencils wife! :lol::lol::lol:  bah!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create a free account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...