B2ET i-Phone Home
#1
Posted 02 June 2010 - 01:20 PM
#2
Posted 02 June 2010 - 11:16 PM
#3
Posted 03 June 2010 - 09:37 AM
Fourgee™, on 02 June 2010 - 11:16 PM, said:
Except the N900!
Which is open mostly source (Not Symbian), has a proper keyboard as well as touch; a higher resolution screen; supports flash well; you can swap the battery; you can use standard MicroSDs, and there's loads of PD software for it.
http://www.gsmarena....a_n900-2917.php
You should have waited a few months as you can now get them on contract!
On a usability and practicality note I have to concede that the iPhone has certainly improved your contactability, or maybe not! Try ringing my old Nokia E70 (with full keyboard) - it cost me £130 (no subsidy) and still gets answered!
#4
Posted 03 June 2010 - 03:44 PM
rather not!
#5
Posted 03 June 2010 - 05:33 PM
I've got a N770, N800 & N810 in my collection so far! None were bought new at anything like original retail. None of those tablet models are actual phones like the N900 though.
#6
Posted 03 June 2010 - 06:35 PM
threegee, on 03 June 2010 - 05:33 PM, said:
I've got a N770, N800 & N810 in my collection so far! None were bought new at anything like original retail. None of those tablet models are actual phones like the N900 though.
why have so many? i've got a nokia 1650 does what is says on the tin and its got a torch!
#7
Posted 07 June 2010 - 12:24 PM
...the handset is a triumph of marketing over functionality. And it’s so ubiquitous it’s not even cool any more.
http://www.telegraph...mpaign=tech0706
From The Telegraph; I could have written this (but didn't!).
#8
Posted 08 June 2010 - 10:44 AM
http://www.damego.co...d-release-notes
4G marketing pitch: "This changes everything. Again" Reality: Nothing changes. Apple is arrogant and treats their customers like idiots. (Chiefly because there's a surplus of idiots with more money than sense around at the moment).
Proof of this the iPad launch where the audience is hanging on Steve Jobs every word, and their applause when the most basic things are being passed off as innovative. Any other company and a critical audience would be pointing out that this or that product could do exactly the same thing, and asking what was really new. They'd also have been asking why it couldn't multitask, and how much of the snappy presentation was because of the lack of any multitasking overhead - a point neatly swept under the carpet by those masters of marketing.
What's really galling is the huge price differential between the same Apple product sold in the USA and the UK. It's almost as if they are saying we know where the biggest idiots live!
#9
Posted 08 June 2010 - 10:59 AM
Quote
I want one, and it would be useful to me, but the fact they openly advertise them from $99 yet over here your talking £200+
Its totally wrong.
Why should the same item cost 4 times as much here as it does over there?
#10
Posted 08 June 2010 - 07:36 PM
#11
Posted 13 June 2010 - 11:31 AM
You don't have to send it back to the factory and pay megabucks to change the battery; the maps are free; they aren't trying to tell you that you can't view Flash websites because THEY have issues with Adobe; there is a flash memory slot; and the audio doesn't have a ball and chain attached to it. It's most likely pretty good at making phonecalls too!
Sample Photo 1
#12
Posted 13 June 2010 - 11:49 AM
threegee, on 13 June 2010 - 11:31 AM, said:
You don't have to send it back to the factory and pay megabucks to change the battery; the maps are free; they aren't trying to tell you that you can't view Flash websites because THEY have issues with Adobe, and the audio doesn't have a ball and chain attached to it.
ThreeGee. Do you have shares with Nokia?
Edited by B2ET_M, 13 June 2010 - 11:49 AM.
#14
Posted 13 June 2010 - 12:06 PM
threegee, on 13 June 2010 - 11:59 AM, said:
I live in Europe, and I don't like to see American marketing outfits sell overpriced tat when we've got better technology at home!
The main thing that put me off having an iPod for so long was the fact that I had to use iTunes with it. Cant stand it is an application and the only thing I remotely liked about it was the 'visualizations'.
Now got an iPod but only due to the fact I can use WinAmp or Foobar to transfer media..
Like I have said, I was going to invest an an Apple Macbook Pro not so long back and even though I intended on getting one whilst in the store I just couldn't justify spending the money on a mediocre setup when I could get something quicker and better for less money with a Windooze computer.
Still on my old laptop now as the money I was going to spend went on other things
#15
Posted 25 June 2010 - 12:45 PM
Quote
"Apple have created a phone that has an antenna on the bottom left-hand side of the phone."
"This means that when you hold it in your left hand, the signal bars slowly fade until there is no signal," he wrote.
http://news.bbc.co.u...ogy/8761240.stm
Maybe when they get on to the iPhone 172c they'll have learnt what proper mobile phone manufacturers learnt about designing good phones - twenty years ago!
#16
Posted 25 June 2010 - 06:22 PM
#17
Posted 02 July 2010 - 11:04 PM
Quote
“Their big drop in bars is because their high bars were never real in the first place.”
Doesn't quite explain why the calls then fail to get through, but maybe that's psychosomatic too?
BTW I hadn't up until this moment realised that multitasking Apple style involves only those selected apps that Apple gives you permission to multitask. In my naivety I'd though that it meant what the rest of the World has always considered it to be. So, there you are: back in pre-history when we ran a TSR program on an early PC we were really multitasking all along! You live and learn - unless - you are an Apple fan, when you simply queue, pay double, and worship!
#18
Posted 13 July 2010 - 07:29 PM
http://blogs.consume...etwork-gsm.html
Read just some of what Apple have removed from their discussion boards here: http://cc.bingj.com/...fddb6d,f506f19b
#19
Posted 13 July 2010 - 11:32 PM
#20
Posted 15 July 2010 - 07:41 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users










